Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 43(3): 432-439, May.-June 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-840840

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objectives To further elucidate which patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) may benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) before targeted therapy (TT), and to assess the overall survival of patients undergoing CN and TT versus TT alone. Materials and Methods We identified 88 patients who underwent CN at our institution prior to planned TT and 35 patients who received TT without undergoing CN. Preoperative risk factors described in the literature were assessed in our patient population (serum albumin, liver metastasis, symptomatic metastasis, clinical ≥T3 disease, retroperitoneal and supradiaphragmatic lymphadenopathy). Patients were stratified by number of pretreatment risk factors and overall survival (OS) was compared. Results TT patients had significantly more risk factors compared to CN patients (3.06 vs. 2.11, p<0.01). Patients who received TT alone had median OS of 5.8 months. All but one patient receiving TT alone had two or more risk factors. A comparison of the CN and TT groups was performed by constructing Kaplan-Meier curves. There was no significant difference in median OS for those patients with exactly two risk factors (447 vs. 389 days, p=0.24), and those with three or more risk factors (184 vs. 155 days, p=0.87). Conclusions Using previously described pretreatment risk factors we found that patients with two or more risk factors derived no significant survival advantage from CN in the TT era. These risk factors should be incorporated in the assessment of patients for CN.


Subject(s)
Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Kidney Neoplasms/therapy , Nephrectomy/methods , Preoperative Care , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Combined Modality Therapy , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Middle Aged
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 42(3): 464-471, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-785732

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Introduction The use of multi-parametric (MP) MRI to diagnose prostate cancer has been the subject of intense research, with many studies showing positive results. The purpose of our study is to better understand the accessibility, role, and perceived accuracy of MP-MRI in practice by surveying practicing urologists. Materials and Methods Surveys were sent to 7,400 practicing American Urological Association member physicians with a current email address. The survey asked demographic information and addressed access, accuracy, cost, and role of prostate MRI in clinical practice. Results Our survey elicited 276 responses. Respondents felt that limited access and prohibitive cost of MP-MRI limits its use, 72% and 59% respectively. Academic urologists ordered more MP-MRI studies per year than those in private practice (43.3% vs. 21.1%; p<0.001). Urologists who performed more than 30 prostatectomies a year were more likely to feel that an MP-MRI would change their surgical approach (37.5% vs. 19.6%, p-value=0.002). Only 25% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that MP-MRI should be used in active surveillance. For patients with negative biopsies and elevated PSA, 39% reported MP-MRI to be very useful. Conclusions Our study found that MP-MRI use is most prominent among practitioners who are oncology fellowship-trained, practice at academic centers, and perform more than 30 prostatectomies per year. Limited access and prohibitive cost of MP-MRI may limit its utility in practice. Additionally, study participants perceive a lack of accuracy of MP-MRI, which is contrary to the recent literature.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Prostate/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Urologists/statistics & numerical data , Prostate/pathology , Prostatectomy/statistics & numerical data , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , United States , Biopsy , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(6): 1126-1131, Nov.-Dec. 2015. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-769771

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To evaluate the overall prognosis of post-stem cell transplant inpatients who required continuous bladder irrigation (CBI) for hematuria. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult stem cell transplant recipients who received CBI for de novo hemorrhagic cystitis as inpatients on the bone marrow transplant service at Washington University from 2011-2013. Patients who had a history of genitourinary malignancy and/or recent surgical urologic intervention were excluded. Multiple variables were examined for association with death. Results: Thirty-three patients met our inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 48 years (23-65). Common malignancies included acute myelogenous leukemia (17/33, 57%), acute lymphocytic leukemia (3/33, 10%), and peripheral T cell lymphoma (3/33, 10%). Median time from stem cell transplant to need for CBI was 2.5 months (0 days-6.6 years). All patients had previously undergone chemotherapy (33/33, 100%) and 14 had undergone prior radiation therapy (14/33, 42%). Twenty-eight patients had an infectious disease (28/33, 85%), most commonly BK viremia (19/33, 58%), cytomegalovirus viremia (17/33, 51%), and bacterial urinary tract infection (8/33, 24%). Twenty-two patients expired during the same admission as CBI treatment (22/33 or 67% of total patients, 22/28 or 79% of deaths), with a 30-day mortality of 52% and a 90-day mortality of 73% from the start of CBI. Conclusions: Hemorrhagic cystitis requiring CBI is a symptom of severe systemic disease in stem cell transplant patients. The need for CBI administration may be a marker for mortality risk from a variety of systemic insults, rather than directly attributable to the hematuria.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Cystitis/mortality , Cystitis/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Hematuria/mortality , Hematuria/therapy , Bone Marrow Transplantation/adverse effects , Bone Marrow Transplantation/mortality , Cystitis/etiology , Hospital Mortality , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematuria/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL